Is Vaping Health Risky?
The writer examines the possible social and health benefits of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electric cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the different possibilities for teens in light of the fact that smoking has become a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that we should consider the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also taking into consideration the dangers of nicotine addiction. The author also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I trust her that e-cigarette vaporizers are a harmless alternative to smoking, if used correctly.
The majority of the data on smoking and its risks comes from adults, and this helps it be hard to assess the way the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It’s estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths each year are due to smoking. This figure is likely an underestimation, since many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. It also assumes that folks who smoke don’t intend to do so.
The author suggests that we should think about the fact Puff Bar that e-cigarettes mimic the effect of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this particular approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, even though it isn’t. Many people don’t understand how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking would be to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that folks who utilize the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that originates from that is that because e smokers don’t feel the physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it’s important to remember that smoking cigarettes and using vaporizers are both very similar behaviors. What makes vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to get the same effect as smoking, without the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking. This means that vapers may be increasing their chances of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they’re taking steps in direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a healthier lifestyle.
The author makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. However, his real issue is among regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be allowed to advertise their products as safe when all they have done is increase the level of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The problem with this argument is that we have already seen the negative effects of increased degrees of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We curently have countless reports about the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers trying to quit. We already have a lot of stories about the rise of cancers and respiratory problems caused by long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been an important factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths over the past few years.
The writer does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking through a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to think about the potential negative health ramifications of his product either. He also discounts the theory that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually turn back to cigarette smoking. He appears to think that all we need to do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the quantity of nicotine we take in. The fact is that smokers who try to quit often do so because of other medical issues, and aren’t just embracing the cigarettes to get away from their bad habits. There are many reasons why people smoke. The writer has basically ignored all of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it is true that the cigarettes usually do not contain any real tobacco, a number of the chemicals found in using tobacco are found in the smokes. The writer seems to be of the fact that all we need to do to solve the issue of smoking is to reduce the amount of chemicals we take in through our lungs. The argument he presents is simply not located in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing the volume of chemicals we ingest improves anything other than our health and wellness. The author also discounts the idea that the cigarettes are less dangerous than regular cigarettes because they don’t contain the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.